Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Feed Feed

Keeping up with the Jones Act

(page 2 of 2)

Matson supports the U.S.-build requirement as a vital component of the Jones Act, citing the importance of ensuring that the U.S. has strong, vital shipyards that are capable of building and maintaining modern, competitive commercial vessels.

Also, the coalition in Washington, D.C., that supports the Jones Act includes politicians from shipbuilding states, so changing that part of the act could endanger the coalition. In 2010, U.S. Senator John McCain helped introduce federal legislation that would have repealed the Jones Act, but the bill did not receive enough support in Congress to pass.

Hull says the biggest cost differences between U.S.-flag and foreign-flag ocean carriers are vessel crew costs (foreign workers earn less than U.S. seafarers) and depreciation (a direct result of the higher construction costs of ships built in the U.S. vs. foreign shipyards). But, he says, these higher costs end up as wages in the pockets of U.S. citizens rather than foreigners. More importantly, he says, these combined costs represent a small percentage of U.S.-flag carriers’ total expenses.

“Every other cost that U.S.-flag carriers incur is the same for a foreign-flag operator: cost of fuel, stores, containers, machinery, vessel loading and discharge, customer service, computer tracking systems, local pickup and delivery, insurance, and overland transportation,” adds Hull. “Thus, the bulk of the costs of shipping are not impacted by the Jones Act and would be the same for all shipping companies, U.S. or foreign.”

U.S. Senate candidate Ed Case says he has believed for some time that, while the Jones Act may have its merits nationally, it “disproportionately harms the noncontiguous parts of our country, like Hawaii.”

“This is because, unlike the mainland, with its trucks and trains and other transportation alternatives, we have no practical options to importing our consumer goods and exporting our local products if Jones Act shippers do not price or service competitively,” explains Case. “As Hawaii’s 2nd District congressman from 2002 to 2007, I represented virtually all Hawaii agriculture, which could not get its products to mainland markets affordably because of an absence of targeted and reasonable transportation services. Even today, Big Island ranches must charter a weekly 747 out of Keahole Airport to get their cattle to the mainland because that’s cheaper than Jones Act shipping. There’s something wrong with that picture.”

But, Matson’s Hull says, “The Jones Act is responsible for thousands of American jobs in Hawaii. According to a recent study undertaken by Price Waterhouse Coopers, the Jones Act contributes 23,225 jobs to the state along with labor compensation of more than $1.1 billion annually.”

That’s of little comfort to the French Gourmet’s Novak, who, at the height of his business, employed 85 local workers.

“We employed good people. We paid a good, fair amount of taxes like everyone else. We exported. Did good for the state. But they’re killing Hawaii. Hawaii could be so much more.”

Hawaii Business magazine invites you to comment on our articles and the issues they raise. Comments are moderated for offensive language, commercial messages and off-topic posts and may be deleted. Some comments may be chosen for inclusion in the magazine on the Feedback page.

Old to new | New to old
Jan 3, 2013 09:07 am
 Posted by  chriswlan

So, if I understand Mr Hull correctly, Jones requires an extra 23225 workers than if there was no Jones????

So everybody in HI has to fork over an extra 1.1 billion to those favored but un-necessary workers?

Jan 3, 2013 09:18 am
 Posted by  chriswlan

How about VASTLY improving the Jones?

Mandate that US cabotage must be done with barges only, ea barge no more than 200 tons, and ea tow no more than a single barge.

Think about the near-endless jobs that will create, immediately, out of thin air!!!!

Instant prosperity!

(as long as you are part of the favored minority, that is...)

Jul 25, 2013 05:30 pm
 Posted by  tonyalfidi

The US needs "Jones Act 2.0" reforms in maritime regulation. Update the covered worker definition, exempt outlying lands, and allow disaster waivers.

Jul 28, 2014 08:01 pm
 Posted by  Fairfax

The French Gourmet's failure can't be blamed on the Jones Act. Shipping a 40-ft reefer container from Honolulu to Dubai is about 16000 nautical miles and takes 44 days. It will cost a small fortune, no matter what carrier you use.

These small shippers don't realize the cost of running ships, supplying containers, and insuring ocean assets.

Hawaii is too small a market to interest large global shipping lines. It's too isolated and is not a balanced trade (import/export).

Add your comment:


Don't Miss an Issue!
Hawaii Business,August